Stellantis N.V.

Сильный индекс, значительно упал. Быки в растерянности.

Strong index, significantly down. The bulls are confused.

Слабый индекс, значительно вырос. Рынок на стороне быков.

Weak index, significantly up. The market is on the bulls' side.

Слабый индекс, незначительно вырос. Приток средств в лонги остается на невысоком уровне.

Weak index, slightly up. The inflow of funds into longs remains at a low level.

Stellantis (NYSE:STLA), a global automaker focused on passenger vehicles, light trucks, engines, and mobility services, closed at $4.69, up 7.57%. The company said third-quarter sales were roughly flat. A highlight for the company was Ram pickup sales jumping 34%.
Trading volume reached 52.0 million shares, coming in about 132% above its three-month average of 22.4 million shares. Stellantis IPO'd in 2010 and has grown 45% since going public.
How the markets moved today
The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX:^GSPC) closed at 7,666, up 0.19%, while the Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC) finished at 26,872, up 0.04%. Among global automotive manufacturing and mobility services peers, General Motors (NYSE:GM) closed at $79.31, up 3.00%, and Ford Motor (NYSE:F) closed at $12.27, up 1.74%, reflecting firmer sentiment across legacy automakers.
What this means for investors
Stellantis shares bounced off a record-low close yesterday after reporting third-quarter sales results and reaffirming its 2026 guidance and long-term financial goals. Total pickup sales jumped 34%, with sales of the popular Ram 1500 soaring 73% year over year.
Stallantis CEO Antonio Filosa used the report to help convince investors that the company's turnaround is on track. Filosa confirmed that the company believes it will still achieve a net revenue increase in the mid-single-digit percentage range this year and expects to be cash flow positive by next year, with an upward trajectory.
Stellantis' stock closed at an all-time low yesterday, but that may turn out to be the bottom if the company achieves its cash flow and profitability goals.
Should you buy stock in Stellantis right now?
Before you buy stock in Stellantis, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Stellantis wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $375,240!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,403,292!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 932% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of October 1, 2026.
Howard Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors and Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Stock Market Today, Oct. 1: Stellantis Surges Off Record Low on Ram Pickup Sales Jump

The NASDAQ 100 Pre-Market Indicator is down -170.94 to 30,437.19. The total Pre-Market volume is currently 111,268,982 shares traded.
The following are the most active stocks for the pre-market session:
Nokia Corporation (NOK) is -0.1502 at $10.24, with 7,055,412 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for NOK is in the "buy range".
VisionWave Holdings, Inc. (VWAV) is -0.47 at $4.40, with 6,627,192 shares traded.
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is +3.73 at $228.80, with 6,432,376 shares traded. Over the last four weeks they have had 8 up revisions for the earnings forecast, for the fiscal quarter ending Oct 2026. The consensus EPS forecast is $2.47. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for NVDA is in the "buy range".
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) is +0.62 at $34.37, with 4,973,447 shares traded. This represents a 3.06% increase from its 52 Week Low.
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is -1.44 at $78.16, with 4,812,709 shares traded. This represents a 109.43% increase from its 52 Week Low.
Intel Corporation (INTC) is -2.97 at $120.03, with 3,495,253 shares traded. INTC's current last sale is 105.75% of the target price of $113.5.
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) is +0.02 at $6.33, with 3,432,802 shares traded. This represents a 77.81% increase from its 52 Week Low.
NIO Inc. (NIO) is +0.06 at $3.64, with 2,221,277 shares traded. NIO's current last sale is 67.41% of the target price of $5.4.
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) is +0.2 at $19.69, with 1,909,262 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for ZTO is in the "buy range".
Amprius Technologies, Inc. (AMPX) is +1.05 at $10.80, with 1,351,088 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for AMPX is in the "buy range".
Stellantis N.V. (STLA) is +0.13 at $4.73, with 1,142,897 shares traded., following a 52-week high recorded in prior regular session.
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is -3.97 at $133.13, with 1,124,315 shares traded. Over the last four weeks they have had 6 up revisions for the earnings forecast, for the fiscal quarter ending Nov 2026. The consensus EPS forecast is $1.57. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for ORCL is in the "buy range".

Pre-Market Most Active for Sep 28, 2026 : NOK, VWAV, NVDA, SQQQ, TQQQ, INTC, CONL, NIO, ZTO, AMPX, STLA, ORCL

Key Points
General Motors' returns have dwarfed that of its peers over the past three years.
While the competition is improving hybrid offerings amid a boom, GM is unveiling new V-8 engines.
The automaker also has a plan, albeit trailing its peers, to attack the growing demand for hybrid options.
To say that General Motors (NYSE: GM) has been doing a lot correctly lately might be an understatement. If the past three years have been a race, GM would be lapping its nearest rivals in Ford Motor Company and Stellantis -- and even its Japanese competition. If a picture is worth a thousand words, this graph says many more.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
So, if the automaker is doing so many things correctly, why is it betting big on hunky V-8 engines when the competition is driving toward the hybrid sales boom? And will the decision cost investors by bringing its stock gains back down to earth?
Let's set the stage
As regulatory and policy changes severely hinder electric vehicle (EV) sales growth in the U.S., consumers have flocked to hybrids as gasoline prices continue to rise amid the Iran conflict. GM made a big gamble with its aggressive strategy to try to skip over the hybrid middle phase and focus more heavily on the long-term EV stage -- a costly mistake that forced the company to take billions in charges and write-downs.
Its competitors invested more in hybrids through this whole process, and they're reaping the benefits. Toyota, at the other end of the spectrum, accounted for 49% of U.S. hybrid sales during the first quarter of 2026, according to Cox Automotive.
On the other hand, GM currently sells one hybrid vehicle, and that's a Corvette. In comparison, Ford has a profitable and broad list of hybrid options. It has strong sales from its F-150 and Maverick hybrids, while also discontinuing light-duty diesels. So is GM doubling down by introducing new V-8 engines and high-mileage diesels instead of rebounding with more hybrid options?
What GM is doing
On Sept. 17, GM unveiled two sixth-generation small-block V-8 engine options for its redesigned Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 pickups that go on sale this fall. This is happening even while dealers, investors, and analysts see competitors building hybrid powertrains as gasoline and diesel prices are up 39% and 73%, respectively, compared to a year ago, according to the AAA.
This looks like a big mistake at first glance, but there are a couple of reasons behind this decision. First, investors know that full-size trucks are the industry's bread-and-butter for juicy margins and big profits, and GM needs to optimize those sales to help offset increased costs from tariffs and the billions in write-downs the automaker took over the past year for driving too fast on its EV strategy.
Second, investors have to consider that these engines aren't developed overnight. The automaker has been working on them before the Trump administration threw multiple curveballs at the automotive industry, and GM will continue to deliver new technology with its gasoline-powered trucks that, even with an eventual transition to EVs, will still have a market.
What it all means
John Murphy, who became a widely respected voice in the automotive industry during his 26 years as Bank of America's automotive analyst, said that General Motors' avoidance of hybrids "is not as clear a major mistake as I think some people believe."
And although the company sells only one hybrid currently, it's not going to stay that way. It is bringing some plug-in hybrids to the market as soon as next year. There aren't clear details yet, but the automaker is likely to focus on adding plug-in hybrid options to its best-selling vehicles and perhaps those that share platforms. The Chevrolet Equinox, Buick Envision, GMC Terrain, and Cadillac XT4 all share a platform for which a hybrid powertrain could be added.
The headlines of GM investing in more gas-guzzling V-8 engines while consumers are more rapidly buying hybrids sound worse than they are. Management is doing a lot of things right. The graph at the beginning isn't going to change because of this strategic move.
Should you buy stock in General Motors right now?
Before you buy stock in General Motors, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and General Motors wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $395,625!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,397,147!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 951% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 214% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 22, 2026.
Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Daniel Miller has positions in Ford Motor Company and General Motors. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors and Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Why This Top Automaker's Gamble on V-8 Engines During a Hybrid Boom Actually Makes Sense

Key Points
Ford Motor leverages a massive network of over 8,000 global dealerships and its Ford+ plan to transition toward connected, electric vehicles.
Stellantis maintains a diverse portfolio of 14 iconic brands and a lean debt profile relative to industry peers.
Which of these automotive giants offers the best path forward for your portfolio?
Traditional automakers face a crossroads as they navigate shifting consumer preferences and the costly transition to electric platforms. Should you bet on Ford Motor (NYSE:F) or Stellantis (NYSE:STLA) for your portfolio?
Ford relies on its dominant position in the truck and fleet markets to fund its technological pivot. Stellantis focuses on a global multi-brand strategy to maximize scale across diverse geographies. This comparison examines which manufacturer balances profitability and balance sheet strength more effectively for long-term investors.
The case for Ford Motor
Ford focuses on its Ford+ plan, which aims to modernize its business through specialized segments like Ford Blue for internal combustion and Ford Model e for electric vehicles. According to its latest annual report, the company distributes its products through nearly 8,226 independently owned dealerships globally as of December 2025. It also serves commercial fleet customers, daily rental agencies, and government entities, providing a steady base of demand.
In FY 2025, revenue reached nearly $187.3 billion, representing a slight growth of roughly 1.2% compared to the prior year. Despite the top-line increase, the company reported a net loss of approximately $8.2 billion for the period. This resulted in a negative net margin of roughly 4.4%, a metric that measures how much profit a company kept from every dollar of sales among consumer discretionary stocks.
As of its December 2025 balance sheet, the debt-to-equity ratio was nearly 4.7x. This ratio measures total debt against shareholder equity, and a higher number suggests the company uses significant debt to fund operations. The current ratio, which measures the ability to pay short-term debts with current assets, was close to 1.1x, and free cash flow was a healthy $12.5 billion.
The case for Stellantis
Stellantis operates as a global mobility powerhouse with a massive footprint spanning Europe, North America, South America, and Africa. According to its latest annual report, the company manages 14 distinct brands, including Jeep, Ram, and Peugeot, serving customers in more than 130 markets. Its strategy focuses on leveraging shared platforms across these brands to reduce manufacturing costs while maintaining broad market coverage.
For FY 2025, revenue was approximately $178.0 billion, which was a decrease of nearly 2.1% year-over-year. The company faced significant headwinds during this period, reporting a net loss of roughly $25.9 billion. This produced a negative net margin of about 14.6%, reflecting higher costs and lower volumes during the fiscal year.
In its December 2025 balance sheet, the debt-to-equity ratio was approximately 0.9x. This indicates a more conservative use of debt relative to equity compared to some larger competitors. The current ratio stood at roughly 1.0x, and free cash flow was negative $15.3 billion, which occurrs when capital expenditures exceed the cash generated from business operations.
Risk profile comparison
Ford faces execution risks as it attempts to integrate its strategic Ford+ initiatives and modernize global systems. The company also deals with quality concerns and potential investigations into driver assistance technology, which could lead to expensive recalls. Volatile costs for raw materials like lithium and nickel further threaten its ability to maintain production levels for new vehicle models.
Stellantis must navigate the cyclical nature of the global automotive market and intense competition from international rivals. Shifting consumer demand and high interest rates can make financing more expensive for buyers, potentially hurting sales volumes. Because specific customer concentrations are not disclosed, the company also faces general risks associated with geopolitical tensions affecting its global manufacturing footprint.
Valuation comparison
Stellantis appears cheaper based on sales and future earnings estimates, while Ford offers significantly better cash generation despite its higher debt levels.
Forward P/E
7.6x
5.4x
P/S ratio
0.3x
0.1x
Valuation metrics sourced from Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) and may differ from other data providers.
Which stock would I buy in 2026?
I'd go with Ford, though this is a choice between two turnarounds at different stages, not between a winner and a loser.
Stellantis is showing encouraging signs. After a bruising 2025, revenue grew sharply year over year, shipments climbed, and the company returned to a small profit in Q2. The cost reduction program is ambitious and on track, and the Leapmotor partnership is gaining traction in Europe's growing EV market. But management flagged significant second-half headwinds from plant shutdowns, lower volumes, and roughly a billion euros in charges still to come. Positive free cash flow is not expected until 2027.
Ford's situation is not dramatically cleaner, but its commercial vehicle business in Ford Pro keeps outperforming and the quality turnaround is gaining traction. The dividend provides a floor for patient shareholders while the recovery plays out. When both companies are in the midst of challenging turnarounds, owning the one already returning cash to shareholders is the more comfortable starting point.
Should you buy stock in Ford Motor Company right now?
Before you buy stock in Ford Motor Company, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Ford Motor Company wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $406,141!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,347,745!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 940% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 18, 2026.
Sara Appino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Ford Motor vs. Stellantis: Which Automotive Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?

The NASDAQ 100 Pre-Market Indicator is up 54.25 to 29,501.23. The total Pre-Market volume is currently 96,532,373 shares traded.
The following are the most active stocks for the pre-market session:
Nokia Corporation (NOK) is +0.1705 at $10.77, with 5,354,677 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for NOK is in the "buy range".
Intel Corporation (INTC) is +1.15 at $109.95, with 4,502,129 shares traded. INTC's current last sale is 96.87% of the target price of $113.5.
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) is -0.12 at $38.41, with 4,181,398 shares traded. This represents a 7.53% increase from its 52 Week Low.
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is +0.27 at $71.65, with 3,706,774 shares traded. This represents a 91.99% increase from its 52 Week Low.
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) is +0.1354 at $5.23, with 3,513,348 shares traded. This represents a 46.78% increase from its 52 Week Low.
CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) is +0.24 at $80.12, with 3,190,787 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for CRWV is in the "buy range".
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) is +0.84 at $44.14, with 2,633,639 shares traded. This represents a 34.41% increase from its 52 Week Low.
BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) is +0.8 at $24.69, with 1,704,379 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for BMNR is in the "buy range".
NIO Inc. (NIO) is +0.07 at $3.69, with 1,677,308 shares traded. NIO's current last sale is 64.74% of the target price of $5.7.
IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) is -0.476 at $39.86, with 803,725 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for IONQ is in the "buy range".
Stellantis N.V. (STLA) is -0.1303 at $4.92, with 800,526 shares traded. STLA's current last sale is 82% of the target price of $6.
Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) is +1.5267 at $86.62, with 793,124 shares traded. CRCL's current last sale is 90.23% of the target price of $96.

Pre-Market Most Active for Sep 18, 2026 : NOK, INTC, SQQQ, TQQQ, CONL, CRWV, IBIT, BMNR, NIO, IONQ, STLA, CRCL

Key Points
Institutional buying (inflows) of Ford stock in the second quarter alone already tops 2025.
Ford has long had questions regarding its recalls, warranty expense, and quality, but now there is evidence of improvement.
Ford Energy has the capability of adding incremental profits to the bottom line.
When all is said and done, the global automotive industry might evolve and transform more over the next decade than it has in the past century. Electric vehicles (EVs) are rapidly advancing; vehicles are becoming more software defined, enabling developments like over-the-air updates; automakers are investing heavily in artificial intelligence (AI) and driverless cars, and more services. And of course, subscriptions are adding value to the daily commuter. It's an exciting time in the industry, and margins should rise on the road ahead.
When investing in the automotive industry, names such as Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA), Rivian (NASDAQ: RIVN), BYD Co., or the Italian juggernaut Ferrari (NYSE: RACE) probably jump to mind, but institutional money is actually pouring into legacy auto Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F). There was nearly $7 billion of institutional buying of Ford stock during the second quarter of 2026 alone, more than during all of 2025. Here's a look at what's likely driving the move into Ford stock.
Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »
Reversing a huge problem
Of course, there are plenty of variables and reasons that could be driving the renewed interest in Ford, but here are two major developments that could be behind it. First, we have to consider that investors and analysts are finally getting raw data that Ford is fixing one of its biggest and most costly problems: vehicle quality. Ford ranked above all competitors in a category it didn't want to win in 2025: manufacturer with most recall campaigns. Ford topped the list with 153 recall campaigns last year, covering nearly 13 million vehicles. Ford had more recall campaigns in the U.S. than any competitor during each of the past five years except in 2024 when Stellantis took the crown briefly.
Not all recalls are created equal, and over-the-air updates can cheaply fix a long list of vehicle issues, but if the vehicle needs physical repairs, it can get costly. Investors will remember Q2 2024 when Ford's total warranty and recall costs surged to $2.3 billion, a $700 million increase over the prior year. It sent pretax profits plunging and crippled Ford's ability to meet Wall Street estimates; the stock initially plunged almost 18%.
Here's the good news! While Ford has for years preached that correcting vehicle quality was a top priority, investors had to rely on the company's word about its internal metrics pointing in a positive direction. That changed when JD Power released its 2026 U.S. Initial Quality Study, which grades brands on "problems per 100 vehicles (PP100)." The lower the score the better. Ford ranked third overall, behind only Porsche and Genesis, and was easily the highest-ranked mass-market brand. The study average reported PP175, while Ford checked in with far fewer problems and a score of PP152. Only three years ago, Ford ranked 23rd in the same study, lending credibility to the idea that Ford is fixing one of its biggest long-term problems.
But wait, there's more
In addition to fixing its vehicle quality woes -- which will take time to filter into the massive number of older Ford vehicles on the road right now -- Wall Street also noticed Ford's newest ambition: Ford Energy. Ford stock soared nearly 50% in May alone before giving back roughly half of those gains since, following the announcement of Ford Energy, which would deliver battery energy storage systems (BESS) to large industrial customers and artificial intelligence (AI) data centers. The latter needs uninterrupted power and a system that helps cut costs by charging when electricity is cheaper and discharging when prices are peaking.
Ford is investing roughly $2 billion to repurpose its Glendale, Kentucky manufacturing plant to produce stationary storage systems capable of delivering 20 GWh of battery storage annually. The first deliveries to customers are scheduled for late next year, and Morgan Stanley analysts estimate that at full annual capacity, Ford Energy could generate between $500 million and $600 million in annual operating profits, or earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT).
What it all means
There could be many reasons why Wall Street's interest in Ford has surged, including the company's lucrative 4.1% dividend yield even after its share price rise. Or Wall Street could be optimistic about Ford's plan to refresh roughly 80% of its North America vehicle portfolio by volume by the end of the decade. However, two big reasons likely influencing Wall Street are that Ford is gaining traction by improving vehicle quality and that it is seeking new revenue streams from its EV and battery technology, which could boost margins above the notoriously low-margin narrative that haunts the automotive industry. Whatever it is, Ford is moving in a positive direction, and Wall Street has certainly noticed.
Should you buy stock in Ford Motor Company right now?
Before you buy stock in Ford Motor Company, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Ford Motor Company wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $412,074!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,314,319!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 932% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 17, 2026.
Daniel Miller has positions in Ford Motor Company. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Ferrari and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends BYD Company and Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Founded in 1993 in Alexandria, VA., by brothers David and Tom Gardner, The Motley Fool is a multimedia financial-services company dedicated to building the world's greatest investment community. Reaching millions of people each month through its website, books, newspaper column, radio show, television appearances, and subscription newsletter services, The Motley Fool champions shareholder values and advocates tirelessly for the individual investor. The company's name was taken from Shakespeare, whose wise fools both instructed and amused, and could speak the truth to the king -- without getting their heads lopped off.

The Under-the-Radar Stock Big Money Is Quietly Buying Up

Key Points
North America will be a critical region for Stellantis' global turnaround to be a success.
Stellantis is tackling North America with big investments and a focus on both ends of the market, more affordable vehicles and high-end variants.
Stellantis is also stepping back from its focus on "full-size trucks" only and introducing some interesting new vehicles such as a Ram SUV.
Investors following legacy automakers as the globe transitions to electric vehicles (EVs) might have identified a big opportunity with Stellantis (NYSE: STLA). While Detroit rivals Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) and General Motors (NYSE: GM) have both traded about 5% higher year to date, Stellantis fell off a cliff with a 51% decline. However, with Stellantis putting up a massive $70 billion turnaround plan, it may have the most upside of all three over the next five years. If we zero in on Stellantis' profit engine, its North America region, it has an interesting strategy of what segments it will attack and what products, especially considering its pullback on less profitable EVs, the $25 billion investment could pay off huge.
North America or bust
Stellantis' $70 billion global "FaSTLAne 2030" plan has a plethora of moving parts and regional strategies stretching across the globe, and all will play their own role in the broader turnaround. However, one make-or-break region for the success of its overall turnaround will absolutely be North America, which has remained the company's profit engine since Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and PSA Group merged 50-50, combining 14 historical auto brands from the U.S., Italy, and France.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
North America is so important to Stellantis' turnaround that its committing 60% of all brand and product investments from its overall plan directly to North America. Those funds will help develop and launch 11 all-new vehicles, expanding its market coverage by a staggering 50%. Stellantis is taking a calculated approach to exactly how it's attacking new North American segments, and it could make all the difference.
Where is the capital going?
On one end of the spectrum, Stellantis is introducing nine vehicles priced under $40,000, providing some relief to pent-up demand for more affordable vehicles as the average price of new vehicles remains near record highs at around $50,000. Stellantis is also planning to use its Chrysler brand as a more regional path to offering even more affordable vehicles, including two priced below $30,000.
On the other end of the spectrum, Stellantis is also using its popular Jeep and Ram brands to pinpoint more lucrative segments with performance models and all-new products. These are arguably the two most important brands in all of Stellantis' global turnaround. One example of where the investment could pay off big is Ram's first-ever SUV, moving into brand-new territory while reviving its historic Ramcharger nameplate. Ram is also looking to expand beyond its historical "full-size-only" focus with the Rampage, a new compact pickup truck, and by reviving the highly anticipated Dakota midsize truck. But wait, there's more: Ram is also infusing capital into the brand to bring new muscle trucks, including the upcoming Ram Rumble Bee and a new SRT TRX variant.
Not to be left behind, Jeep gets attention in the form of a $600 million investment to reopen a Belvidere Assembly Plant in Illinois which will increase production of the next-generation Jeep Compass and bring back the Jeep Cherokee. Furthermore, Jeep's core product portfolio will undergo a complete overhaul by the end of this decade, with a complete redesign of the Wrangler SUV and Gladiator pickup, refreshed Grand Cherokee and Grand Wagoneer, and a rebooted Street and Racing Technology (SRT) division.
What it all means
Here's the good news, as well as the catch: Stellantis' use of Chrysler and other more affordable models to attack the affordability crisis happening in the U.S. auto market is a brilliant way to increase sales volume and production capacity utilization. The catch is that Stellantis will have work to do on its value strategy and cost-cutting to ensure these vehicles remain profitable, or the turnaround will lose steam.
The Ram brand SUV and Jeep truck are intriguing and will likely be very profitable for the automaker, and bringing back its SRT division and a lineup of new high-performance models should offset the lower-margin push toward vehicles. Together, the balanced approach should bode well for Stellantis as it gears up to return its profit engine, North America, to adjusted operating income margins of 8% to 10%; increase North America volume by 35%; and improve production capacity utilization to 80%, all by the end of the decade. If Stellantis can begin taking steps, as it did during the second half of 2025, to reaching these targets, the stock could rapidly rise over the next few years.
Should you buy stock in Stellantis right now?
Before you buy stock in Stellantis, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Stellantis wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $412,074!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,314,319!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 932% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 17, 2026.
Daniel Miller has positions in Ford Motor Company and General Motors. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors and Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Stellantis' $25 Billion Gamble: Can a Fresh and Balanced Strategy Spark a Turnaround in Its Profit Engine?

The NASDAQ 100 Pre-Market Indicator is up 460.62 to 29,405.68. The total Pre-Market volume is currently 277,311,639 shares traded.
The following are the most active stocks for the pre-market session:
Nokia Corporation (NOK) is +0.5104 at $10.65, with 5,828,173 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for NOK is in the "buy range".
BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) is +0.72 at $23.53, with 1,479,442 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for BMNR is in the "buy range".
Stellantis N.V. (STLA) is +0.19 at $5.11, with 1,440,289 shares traded., following a 52-week high recorded in prior regular session.
NIO Inc. (NIO) is +0.03 at $3.61, with 1,203,079 shares traded. NIO's current last sale is 63.33% of the target price of $5.7.
Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) is +3.35 at $83.80, with 984,250 shares traded. CRCL's current last sale is 87.29% of the target price of $96.
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is +3.59 at $146.75, with 725,408 shares traded. Over the last four weeks they have had 6 up revisions for the earnings forecast, for the fiscal quarter ending Nov 2026. The consensus EPS forecast is $1.57. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for ORCL is in the "buy range".

Pre-Market Most Active for Sep 17, 2026 : NOK, BMNR, STLA, NIO, CRCL, ORCL

Key Points
Joby is ahead of Archer in the race for FAA certification.
Joby also generates a lot more revenue than Archer.
Joby Aviation (NYSE: JOBY) and Archer Aviation (NYSE: ACHR) are both early movers in the nascent electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft market. But over the past 12 months, shares of Joby and Archer have declined about 60% and 40%, respectively.
Without the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) certification for their first commercial flights, both companies struggled to impress their investors. Geopolitical conflicts, inflation, and fears of interest rate hikes also drove many investors toward more conservative investments.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
But if we take a closer look at Joby and Archer, we'll notice that one key metric sets the two companies apart. With a market cap of $6.1 billion, Joby trades at 51 times this year's sales. Archer, which is valued at $4.2 billion, trades at 278 times this year's sales. Let's see why Archer's price-to-sales ratio is so much higher than Joby's, and if that will change in the future.
Joby generates much more revenue than Archer
Neither Joby nor Archer generates any revenue from commercial eVTOL flights. However, Joby's revenue surged from less than $1 million in 2024 to $53.4 million in 2025 as it received the first payments from its contracts with the U.S. Air Force's Agility Prime program. It also recognized some revenue from its acquisition of Blade Air Mobility's passenger business, a provider of helicopter and seaplane services, which closed last August.
For 2026, analysts expect its revenue to more than double to $119.5 million as it integrates Blade's passenger business and generates more revenue from its Agility Prime R&D contracts.
Archer also holds contracts with the Agility Prime program, but they function more like government-subsidized test flights rather than revenue-generating R&D projects. Unlike Joby, which plans to become a vertically integrated "transportation as a service" business that manufactures, owns, and operates its own air taxi network, Archer is an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) that sells most of its aircraft to third-party fleets. That's why it hasn't acquired any consumer-facing, revenue-generating businesses.
Archer generated less than $1 million in revenue in 2025. Still, analysts expect that figure to rise to $15.1 million in 2026 as it collects more leases and utilization fees from Hawthorne Airport in Southern California, which it acquired as a hub and test site last November.
But is Archer actually cheaper relative to its long-term growth potential?
The FAA certification process consists of five stages. Joby has already reached the fifth stage, while Archer has just completed the third stage.
Therefore, Joby could launch its first commercial flights in the U.S. before Archer. However, Archer's business could expand faster than Joby's -- albeit at lower margins -- because it's an OEM that will sell its Midnight eVTOLs to other companies. Joby will primarily use its S4 eVTOLs on its own air-taxi network, which will be integrated with Uber's platform.
Both companies have big manufacturing partners. Toyota backs Joby, and Stellantis supports Archer. However, Joby's partnership with Toyota is deeper and more structurally symbiotic than Stellantis' investment-driven deal with Joby.
By 2028, analysts expect Joby's revenue to reach $434.8 million. At its current market cap, it's valued at 14 times that estimate. But Archer's revenue is expected to reach $511.5 million by 2028 -- and it trades at just eight times that estimate. So while Archer looks more expensive than Joby today, that balance could shift over the next few years as it ramps up its production.
That said, I still think Joby is a better all-around eVTOL stock than Archer for three reasons. First, the S4's single tilt-rotor propellers make it faster and more energy-efficient than the Midnight. Second, Joby's vertically integrated business will generate higher margins than Archer's OEM business. Lastly, it's further ahead of Archer in the FAA certification race.
Should you buy stock in Joby Aviation right now?
Before you buy stock in Joby Aviation, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Joby Aviation wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $420,109!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,303,689!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 938% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 16, 2026.
Leo Sun has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Stellantis and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The 1 Metric That Separates Joby From Archer in the Race to FAA Certification

The NASDAQ 100 Pre-Market Indicator is up 139.74 to 29,077.58. The total Pre-Market volume is currently 75,563,862 shares traded.
The following are the most active stocks for the pre-market session:
Nokia Corporation (NOK) is +0.54 at $10.38, with 7,997,243 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for NOK is in the "buy range".
Intel Corporation (INTC) is +3.78 at $100.92, with 6,444,952 shares traded. INTC's current last sale is 88.92% of the target price of $113.5.
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is +1.22 at $69.12, with 2,821,355 shares traded. This represents a 85.21% increase from its 52 Week Low.
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) is -0.74 at $39.88, with 2,497,577 shares traded. This represents a 11.65% increase from its 52 Week Low.
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) is -0.07 at $18.13, with 2,068,019 shares traded. This represents a 57.31% increase from its 52 Week Low.
GraniteShares 2x Short SK Hynix Daily ETF (SKDD) is -0.54 at $7.55, with 1,762,730 shares traded. This represents a 18.71% increase from its 52 Week Low.
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is +2.09 at $214.26, with 1,744,271 shares traded. Over the last four weeks they have had 10 up revisions for the earnings forecast, for the fiscal quarter ending Oct 2026. The consensus EPS forecast is $2.47. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for NVDA is in the "buy range".
BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) is -0.0346 at $23.57, with 1,011,820 shares traded. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for BMNR is in the "buy range".
Stellantis N.V. (STLA) is -0.07 at $5.04, with 883,711 shares traded. STLA's current last sale is 84% of the target price of $6.
NIO Inc. (NIO) is +0.0015 at $3.60, with 872,460 shares traded. NIO's current last sale is 63.18% of the target price of $5.7.
Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) is -0.52 at $85.78, with 589,327 shares traded. CRCL's current last sale is 89.35% of the target price of $96.
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is +0.8501 at $141.20, with 523,286 shares traded. Over the last four weeks they have had 5 up revisions for the earnings forecast, for the fiscal quarter ending Nov 2026. The consensus EPS forecast is $1.58. As reported by Zacks, the current mean recommendation for ORCL is in the "buy range".

Periodand min./max. price, $	Price change, %		Volatility, %		Volume, $
Periodand min./max. price, $	STLA	Industry	STLA	Industry	Volume, $
Yesterday 4.1 - 4.2	-2.88	2.41	2.04	1.58	—
Week 3.9 - 4.4	-7.24	2.69	5.30	2.23	1.23B
Month 3.9 - 4.8	-14.88	8.42	14.49	6.24	4.19B
3 Months 3.9 - 6.1	-29.16	1.31	23.54	9.77	8.90B
6 Months 3.9 - 8.3	-49.11	2.32	39.27	18.72	15.71B
Year 3.9 - 12.2	-63.42	5.70	49.96	29.01	32.39B
3 years 3.9 - 29.5	-78.40	38.46	78.66	59.01	99.36B
5 years 3.9 - 29.5	-80.18	27.52	95.82	80.34	138.64B
All time 8.4 - 29.5	-45.70	353.52	—	—	123.68B

Stellantis N.V.

Price and volatility history

Risk ratios